Full understanding of organizations and doing integrated organization studies and analyses depend on careful attention to the social and cultural context of organizations. So, discourse analyses as a qualitative research strategy which considers situational context of organizations and takes into accounts that “imaginations” and “experiences” are constructed by language assists researchers to achieve this goal. Thus the purposes of this article are first; to explain the theoretical perspectives of discourse and discourse analysis, second; determining the paradigmatic position of this approach and third; describing the course of action.

While much reflected being revolutionary and revolutional acting in the Iranian ruling discourse, however its theoretical bases and potentials in respect to socio-political issues are low deducted from our religious teachings. The subject of this article is framing some of basic & cultural parameters of man revolutionary action, based on religious & Islamic teachings. The article in method is deductive and Interpretative, mostly uses parameters of discourse analysis; in form of a framework of concept dichotomies around meaning of revolutionary action, by analysis of revolutionary-critical discourses of the modern West. Then in a comparative aspect, the religious & Islamic discourse is reinterpreted on the basis of given dichotomies, resulting in the subject perception. In this regard, schematic documentation follows, from Islamic first-handed authorities as well as thoughts of some contemporary revolutionary Iranian theorists. Concept framework of parameters improving revolutionary action and personality in the Islamic discourse from the article point-view includes: basic and intense “ opposition” of religion to some human groups and phenomena like disbelief and oppression, improving human “ collectivism” and social responsibility, improving spiritual, ultra-mundane “ idealism” , improving human “ activism” and free will, improving “ humanistic” and God-centered vision in determining social trends, improving human “ independence” of social passive customs and contexts, religion “ politicism” and much attention to power and socio-political dominance (vilayah). These factors are missed or shortened in the other common revolutionary-cultural schools or non-Islamic spiritualties.

Contemporary approaches interpreted political theory as ignoring political reality, lacking a real problem and more subject of the abstract and metaphysical dignity. The research is opposed to this view and attempting to interpret political theory as engaging in political reality. For this purpose, this study intends to present a discursive conception of ancient Greek political theory and its relationship with political action - as a criterion of political reality. For this reason, the writers, first of all, look at the genealogy of the conditions for the emergence of political theory in ancient Greece.Then, by choosing the concept of polis as the central sign of ancient Greek political theory, explaining the centrality of this concept. The following section attempts to reveal the relation of discourse of the polis with the fundamental elements of the ancient Greek political theory. The last issue is about the quality and the relationship between political theory and political action in ancient Greece. This research uses the assumptions of discourse theory to support its claim.

Introduction: Effective plaque removal is an important factor in the long-term clinical success of dental implants. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of a powered toothbrush (Power Cross-Action) and a manual toothbrush (Cross-Action) in the control of plaque and soft tissue inflammation around implants supporting mandibular overdentures.Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-over clinical trial. The subjects included 10 edentulous subjects, aged 47-73 years, with removable mandibular overdentures supported by 2 unsplinted implants, all the subjects wore maxillary complete dentures. The study consisted of two 4-week phases separated by a 2-week interval. In each phase each subject randomly used one toothbrush type. Two days prior to each phase, the implants were polished. Plaque and bleeding indices were recorded before and after brushing. Data was analyzed by t-test using SPSS software (a=0.05).Results: Both toothbrushes reduced the indices under study. Means of plaque index decreases were 0.5 in manual toothbrush and 0.44 in powered toothbrush. Means of bleeding index decreases were 0.27 in manual toothbrush and 0.3 in powered toothbrush. There were no statistically significant differences between the two toothbrush types in changing plaque index (p value=0.88) and bleeding index (p value=0.91).Conclusion: Both toothbrushes were efficient in plaque control around implants which supported mandibular overdentures and there was no difference between them. Patients can use one of these toothbrushes depending on personal preference and comfort.

The signs that direct the discourse of a narrative to create a core action in the central core and to reproduce intelligent and program-oriented meanings constitute the pattern of Greimas’ action discourse in the context of the narrative. The preface of Persian classics reflects the author's feelings in creating the work. This essay has examined the narrator's reasons for creating the narrative by exploring the discourse in the process of creating the narrative and the reception of the verbal signs in the prefaces of the verses of Nizāmi Ganjavi ‘s Makhzan-ol-Asrār and Iskandernāme. This essay explained the manner of discourse action in the opening of these Masnavies using a descriptive-analytical approach to illustrate the composition of these poems based on Greimas’s discourse and relying on the study of the signs that refer to the conditions of the Nizāmi in the preface during the creation of the works. This study investigated the evolution of Nizmi's states using Greimas' action discourse theory and extracted and analyzed the pattern of action-value and action-prescriptive discourses in the central core of the preface of the ethical and didactic works of this narrative poet by extracting discourse signs.

Storytelling is one of the important and practical tactics employed in the Koran to convey meanings and concepts. The present article adopts discourse semio-semantics, which is considered as a new approach and which provides the possibility of systematic analysis and evaluation of texts, to make a contribution to this process of conveying Koranic meanings and terms. The story of Dhul-Qarnayn in the Koran, an important didactic story which depicts one of the important idols who played a role in humanity’ s world, has the potential to be studied from a semio-semantic perspective. The Koran introduces Dhul-Qarnayn by describing his three journeys. There are sixteen verses in the eighteenth chapter (sū rat) of the Koran, i. e. “ The Cave” (Al-Kahf), about his personality and actions. Therefore, the writer seeks to discover the discourse process governing this story in order to provide a plan for the process of production of and formulating meaning in the story. The findings suggest that the dominant discourse of the story, especially in his third journey which is made to build a dam, is action-based. Action function has an important role in the narrative process of the story and action atmosphere controls the process of meaning production. Activists, by gaining power during an action process, are released from meaning crisis and go from the negative status of disconnection from security to the positive status of connection to security. Moreover during this process they succeed in taking over the value object which they had lost due to an external force. Furthermore, Dhul-Qarnayn’ s all three journeys are driven by his superego since they are made to the farthest places in order to create a space to take humanity to perfection. This behavior originates from his monotheistic view, which is his fundamental belief and is rooted in his essence, and conveys the ethic process to the reader.

Objective: Mechanical plaque removal namely tooth brushing is the most commonly used oral hygiene technique. Efficacy of tooth brushing is influenced by the design and shape of toothbrush. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two common Iranian toothbrushes with a foreign made one in plaque removal.Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on 30 female dental students in Babol University, School of Dentistry using simple randomized sampling. Oral B Cross Action(Germany), Panberes Cross Action and Panberes Classic (Iran) toothbrushes were compared. Students were asked not to brush their teeth for 24 hours before the first visit. At the first visit, subjects received oral prophylactic procedures and the baseline plaque index was recorded before brushing for all subjects using 0' Leary plaque index. In order to match the conditions, Bass tooth brushing technique was instructed to subjects. Students were then randomly divided into 3 groups of 10. The subjects were provided with the three toothbrushes for use in the first, second and third weeks. The plaque index was recorded after using each toothbrush for one week. Paired t-test was used to compare the efficacy of toothbrushes in plaque removal in the same subject while ANOV A was applied for the comparison between the three toothbrushes.Results: Significant reductions were observed in plaque index after using each toothbrush. Plaque index reduction was the highest for Oral B Cross Action and the lowest for Panberes Classic (P=0.001). Oral B Cross Action and a significant difference with Panberes Classic in mean plaque index reduction (P=0.018). Panberes Cross Action and Oral B Cross Action were not significantly different in this respect (P=0=797).Conclusion: Oral B Cross Action and Panberes Cross Action were not significantly different in terms of plaque index reduction. However, the mentioned two toothbrushes had a significant difference in this respect with Panberes Classic.

The novel is one of the common types of contemporary literature that is directly related to the socio-political construction of any society. It has now strengthened this bond in recent decades; because epics and myths with their many capabilities can help the author to reflect the context of the metatext and express the issues for or against it. Hence, novelists also employ different and sometimes contradictory approaches to the context of the metatext. In this study, we seek to answer the question that Belqeis Soleimani as of one of the authors of this type of novel, why and how invited epic characters to her novel?" To answer this question, we first examine the socio-political construction of the time of writing the novel (the eighties Ssi). Then, using the method of qualitative content analysis, we have clarified the author's position for or against the context of our metatext. Findings show that Soleimani by calling the active and norm-breaking activist Rudabeh of Shahnameh to her novel and making her passive against the norms of the patriarchal society and showing the negative consequences of such norms for Rudabeh as a representative of women, tries to represent and weaken patriarchal discourse by creating tension between actions of pretext Rudabeh and protext Rudabeh.

The novel is one of the common types of contemporary literature that is directly related to the socio-political construction of any society. It has now strengthened this bond in recent decades,because epics and myths with their many capabilities can help the author to reflect the context of the metatext and express the issues for or against it. Hence, novelists also employ different and sometimes contradictory approaches to the context of the metatext. In this study, we seek to answer the question that Belqeis Soleimani as of one of the authors of this type of novel, why and how invited epic characters to her novel? " To answer this question, we first examine the socio-political construction of the time of writing the novel (the eighties Ssi). Then, using the method of qualitative content analysis, we have clarified the author's position for or against the context of our metatext. Findings show that Soleimani by calling the active and norm-breaking activist Rudabeh of Shahnameh to her novel and making her passive against the norms of the patriarchal society and showing the negative consequences of such norms for Rudabeh as a representative of women, tries to represent and weaken patriarchal discourse by creating tension between actions of pretext Rudabeh and protext Rudabeh.

The body of the present study includes the study of semiotics and the analysis of the systems of action of the book "This dog wants to take Roxana" by Qassem Kashkoli. At first, the existing discourse systems will be examined and in the next stage, these discourse systems will be examined interdisciplinary to examine its main features, including action. Then, these characteristics are examined in the form of narrative processes specific to this author and it will be determined what is the place of action and cognition in relation to transcendental functions. So our main issue in this article is to see how the action anchors are destroyed one after the other, giving way to turbulent and indeterminate rays. In fact, the main purpose of this article is how delaying action, mechanization of time, rupture in the connection of action elements cause the destruction of semantic anchors and lead to semantic turbulence. In fact, each of the characteristics of action and eloquence and multiple dimensions of the study of discourse systems in the context of the sign-semantics approach of discourse in this work is somewhat evident. So the key is to see how the action anchors are destroyed one after the other, giving way to turbulent, indeterminate glass. Also, how action suspension, time mechanization, rupture in the connection of action elements, and sudden displacement of narrative elements cause the destruction of semantic anchors and semantic turbulence. Then based on what pattern the semantic-sign process is developed to lead to the production of volatile meanings. In fact, the present article tries to answer these questions: 1-What factors cause the destruction of semantic anchors in the studied work? 2. What are the most important aspects of the representation of discourse in " this dog wants to take, Roxana" and how do these aspects lead us to a fluid and post-discourse.